The Star Of Africa Diamond: Symbol of Monarchy, Colonization, or Both?

The return of the diamond would be an act of justice and cultural restitution. These demands stem from a broader global conversation surrounding the restitution of cultural artifacts and treasures acquired through colonization (think Benin Bronzes or almost anything in the British Museum). Returning these types of artifacts serve as a step toward healing historical wounds and acknowledging the importance of preserving heritage in its rightful context.

Mothusi Kamanga, a lawyer and activist in Johannesburg who has promoted an online petition said in a quote to CNN, “The diamond needs to come to South Africa. It needs to be a sign of our pride, our heritage, our culture.” Kamanga, whose petition has gathered about 8,000 signatures, continued, “I think generally the African people are starting to realize that to decolonize is not just to let people have certain freedoms, but it’s also to take back what has been expropriated from us.”

Other than watching the coronation on TV or visiting the Crown Jewels in London, the only way for South Africans to see their gem is through a fake, a replica on display at the Cape Town Diamond Museum. 

But, as with all repatriation cases, there isn’t a clear answer. Others don’t think it matters much anymore. A local Johannesburg resident Dieketseng Nzhadzhaba told CNN, “Things have changed, we’re evolving.” And on the British side, many support retaining the diamond within the British crown jewels, arguing that it represents an integral part of Britain’s history and tradition. Since 1905, the diamond has made cultural and historical connections in English history, along with the meticulous preservation and safeguarding of the crown jewels within the Tower of London.

So how can we find a middle ground? Where can heritage, history, and justice be considered with equal weight? Is there a world in which the South Africans and the British collaborated, exploring ways to honor the historical significance of the diamond? Perhaps there could be temporary and traveling exhibitions, cultural exchanges, or joint initiatives that celebrate the diamond’s origins and emphasis shared by both nations. Such collaborative efforts could serve as platforms for not only cultural education, but also understanding, and a deeper appreciation of the complexities surrounding historical artifacts. 

As discussions surrounding cultural restitution continue to evolve, finding a balanced approach that respects both the heritage of the diamond within the British monarchy and the aspirations for justice and cultural preservation is vital. The Star of Africa diamond stands as a testament to the ongoing discourse surrounding the return of cultural artifacts and the need for nuanced and inclusive conversations about our shared history.